Make your voice heard in the alt engine debate. Tell your reps in Congress to oppose wasteful spending here. Be sure to write to your Representative in the House and both Senators. Thank you for your support!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Contact Congress
Recommended
- Read about the ATEC Engine Competition for the Black Hawk and Apache Helicopters
- Flying the GE Skies: Pork, politics and the engine the Pentagon doesn't want
- EDITORIAL: Second engine for F-35 is a waste
- Gates is right about Defense Efficiency
- ABC News: Pentagon Chokes on Pork
- Pork with wings: A second engine for Texas-made fighters is costly dead weight
- Alternate Engine: A $3 Billion Government Boondoggle?
- Unnecessary extra fighter engine: $3 billion defense spending waste
- Costly earmark undercuts fighter
- Wichita Eagle:Ground funding for jet engine
- Korb & Thompson: Buying Second Engine For F-35 Wastes Money, Hurts Military
- General Mike Loh - No Alternate Needed: Experience Says Second F-35 Engine Would Be Waste
The F135 Engine Blog
- F135 Engine Blog
- Pratt & Whitney’s F135 propulsion system powers the new advanced, single-engine tactical fighter, the F-35 Lightning II, developed by Lockheed Martin. The F-35 has unique capabilities for conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL), carrier-variant (CV), and short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL). The same F135 engine will power all three variants. Visit http://www.f135engine.com to learn more.
Search This Blog
Labels
- Alternate Engine
- Backup Engine
- Budget
- Congress
- Defense Procurement
- Defense Secretary Gates
- Defense Spending
- Department of Defense
- DoD
- Earmark
- Extra Engine
- F-35
- F-35 Lightning II
- F135
- F135 engine
- F136
- F136 engine
- Government Spending
- Joint Strike Fighter
- JSF
- Lockheed Martin
- Pentagon
- Pork
- Short Take Off Vertical Landing
- STOVL
- STOVL propulsion system
- White House
No comments:
Post a Comment